Earth, Moon, and Stars

Cornelius Agrippa in his Three Books of Occult Philosophy (book I, chapter 8; book II, chapter 7) relates the four elements to the celestial objects, namely the planets, mostly because magicians like to figure out what can stand in for what in different contexts.  According to Agrippa, Earth is the element that basically allows all of Creation to be created (book I, chapter 5):

Now the Basis, and foundation of all the Elements, is the Earth, for that is the object, subject, and receptacle of all Celestiall rayes, and influencies; in it are contained the seeds, and Seminall vertues of all things; and therefore it is said to be Animall, Vegetable, and Minerall. It being made fruitfull by the other Elements, and the Heavens, brings forth all things of it self; It receives the abundance of all things, and is, as it were the first fountain, from whence all things spring, it is the Center, foundation, and mother of all things…It is the first matter of our Creation, and the truest Medicine that can restore, and preserve us.

Agrippa makes a connection between Earth and the Moon and the fixed stars, indicating how the element of Earth can be reflected in the skies.  I mentioned this briefly before, focusing mostly on the connection between elemental Earth and planetary Moon:

…the heaven of the Moon is the closest to Earth, making it the most dense of the seven planets.  As the most dense planet, it’s the last stop for an Idea coming from the sphere of the Prime Mover through the stars and the other planets to finally come into form; this is the sphere where something actually takes a materialized shape, even if it’s only illusory and ephemeral.  This is also shown since, as the fastest moving planet and the lowest rung on the ladder, it collects the rays and forces of all the other planets and influences above it, focusing them like a lens onto the Earth…Like the element of Earth, which takes form and receives the influences of the other elements, the Moon takes form and receives the influences of the other planets.

The connection between the terrestrial sphere of Earth and the celestial sphere of the fixed stars is a little more difficult for me to rationalize.  I suppose I’ve been going on the notion that, just as Earth is the most stable and immovable of the elements, so too are the fixed stars the most stable and immovable of the celestial objects referenced in magic.  After all, they don’t really move much (at an extremely slow rate, not counting the negligible effect the motion of the fixed stars have to each other), especially compared to the otherwise rapid motion of the wandering stars (a.k.a. planets).  Beyond that, I never really thought about it much.  I’ve got some other work before I get up and running with the sphere of the fixed stars, so I haven’t actually gone up to call Iophiel (or Raziel, depending on the text).

Recently, I was chatting with Auriel, the archangelic king of the sphere of Earth, and after the usual friendly chat, catching up over a glass of wine in a circle, and empowerment of myself and my sphere with the element of Earth, we sat down and started talking about what Earth is really like at length and in depth.  As usual, “as above so below” is a good rule to go by, and Auriel instructed me to take a look at the Tree of Life a little more closely, especially between the sephiroth of Malkuth and Kether.  For one, everything in the sphere of the Earth, the sephirah of Malkuth, has at least a little Earth in it; that’s why the elemental colors of Malkuth are “dim” or murky, to show that they’re not the pure elements in their ideal form.  Malkuth is the physical, material universe, the one that modern atheistic scientism holds is the only thing that exists.  On the other hand, Kether is unmanifest infinity, divinely simple in that everything that is, was, will be, isn’t, was never, can never, and may be is all One Thing.

Without Earth, nothing can have a material basis; it’s the only element that can’t combine on its own with itself, but can combine with itself through the use of other elements that it’s blended with.  Earth, for instance, can offer a basis for Fire to burn, a course for Air to flow over, or a container for Water to fill, but Earth cannot do anything with Earth on its own.  Because of this, it’s more than just convenience that everything on Earth is at least partially made of Earth, both sharing the same name.  Earth is the most malleable of elements, and takes the influence from everything above it.  Earth is the key to manifestation; without it, much like in the geomantic figure Cauda Draconis, everything passes away from and nothing can be brought into material reality.  Without Earth, the bottom drops out quite literally.

The highest sephirah is Kether, the Crown, which is basically the starting point for infinity from finite existence, the place where finite reality stops having an end and starts having no end and no limit at all.  Though it has the qabbalistic path number of one, and though I don’t have much experience to talk about it, I feel like this is somewhat misleading.  Although one is computationally the root of all numbers, Kether includes all things that exist as well as all things that don’t exist.  In that sense, Kether might be better termed i or something.  Things don’t really start to begin the process of manifestation until an Idea from the Infinite Mind, a Ray from the Infinite Light passes through the second sephirah called Chokmah, the sphere of the fixed stars.  There, something finally makes the jump from “possibility of manifestation” to “manifesting”, where things actually start to legitimately make the claim of existing.  The fall from grace, the first step of the Fool is just the first step in the Chain of Manifestation, but it’s still progress all the same.

The sphere of the fixed stars allows only rays of light that come from the sphere of the Prime Mover; these rays pass through the darkness of the Fool’s cliff and are filtered through the stars in constellations or particular regions of the sky, and appear to us down on Earth as starlight.  Without that filter to provide form, infinite possibility could never be whittled down to probable possibility.  It is this pure Light, filtered through the eighth sphere, that can take on shape or form or purpose later on based on its Idea above.  The fixed stars take on the influence and nature of the Light above it and pass it down into the world as the beginning of Creation.

The similarities between Kether and Chokmah, or the spheres of the Prime Mover and the fixed stars, with Yesod and Malkuth, or the spheres of the Moon and the Earth, now become apparent.  The Moon and Infinite Light both provide an imagined substance to be manifested in the realm beneath it; the Earth supplies a concrete, manifested form based on the imaged and astral form from the Moon, while the fixed stars supply a viable, manifesting Idea based on the unbound and divine Idea from the Source.  The difference between King and Kingdom lies in where and how things come to be.  Just as the fixed stars provide realization for an idea to manifest something at the beginning, Earth provides substance for form to manifest something at the end.  It’s this ability to turn undefined, vague things into clear(er), specific things that relates the fixed stars to the Earth.

At least, that’s my opinion for now.  Though much can be said of the stars and planets and elements in writing, especially in terms of theory and cosmology, working with magic is still a mystery: it requires working with and experience to really grok the whole shebang.  But I’ll go with Auriel’s guidance for now.

Advertisements

About polyphanes
I'm a software developer and Hermetic occultist living near Washington, DC, USA. I claim that I'm youthful, dashing, daring, and other things. I make things and chant stuff, and periodically write about them.

8 Responses to Earth, Moon, and Stars

  1. Spanish Moss says:

    If I recall correctly, in the book The Magus by Sir Francis Barrett, the first number is two because it is the first that can be counted. One is more like the All-womb from which two is able to be qualified as being defined. This is in line with how I was taught to work with the associated Sepheroth in my early training. Just thought I would share.

    Boidh Se!
    -SM

    “Lost in a thicket bare-foot upon a thorned path.”

    • polyphanes says:

      Taking a look at Theology of Arithmetic by Iamblichus), even two isn’t the first number that can appropriately be counted; it’s the first divisible number and the first multitude, but rests between simple unity (One) and countable plurality (Three). After all, the point which is infinite in its own unique ways (it is the center of any and all areas of boundless shape or distance), and with two points we may only establish the shape of the line without boundary (no other lines exist to cut it off), even though we may have direction or motion. With three points, however, we can establish a plane or bounded area, an area to fill and build upon (Binah and below). It’s like the midpoint between unmanifested infinity of One and any further manifested form starting at Three. Still, it is the beginning of differentiation in nature, since One has everything as, well, one thing, but Two establishes duality, difference, and relation, “is” versus “isn’t”. It works well qabbalistically, because the fixed stars are the boundary between Kether and Binah, between Idea and Form, between pure Godlight and planetary reflection. Considering the difference between Iamblichus and later philosophers, I’m inclined to go with the interpretation of the latter (including your teachings). Still, them ancient Greeks were onto something, obtuse as it may be. :P

      Just to be nitpicky, Barrett plagiarized that entire work of his from older sources, especially Agrippa who forms the vast bulk of Barrett’s stuff, in addition to older Solomonic literature. Agrippa, for instance, in book II chapter 5 of his Three Books, has this to say on Two: The first Number is of two, because it is the first Multitude, it can be measured by no number besides unity alone, the common measure of all Numbers: It is not compounded of Numbers, but of one unity only; neither is it called a number uncompounded, but more properly not compounded: The Number of three is called the first Number uncompounded: But the Number of two is the first branch of unity, and the first procreation: Hence it is called generation, and Juno, and an imaginable Corporation, the proof of the first motion, the first form of parity: the number of the first equality, extremity, and distance betwixt, and therefore of peculiar equity, and the proper act thereof, because it consists of two equally poysed…

      • Spanish Moss says:

        Good stuff there. I need to get ahold of that book and add it to the giant pile of what I am currently reading; the never ending heap that it is.

        Oh, Barrett certainly plagiarized the hell out of everything. I’d grab a copy of Agrippa’s work first for sure. Your post just reminded me of my own mental notes I made when reading it a few years back.

        As an aside, the supernals and the associated numbers have been explained thus (only if I could recall where I picked it up): 1 I am, 2 that, 3 the knowing of both.

        Anyway… I enjoyed your post and it was the catalyst to get me thinking about some stuff I hadn’t visited in awhile.

        • polyphanes says:

          Definitely agreed on the supremacy of the Monad, Dyad, and Triad; they establish the foundation for everything that comes after, which gives them their nature as the supernals in the Qabbalah. Dare I ask what it was that this post brought you back to?

          (Also, I realize in retrospect that I may have come across as a bit prickly or defensive above. Sorry about that; just at work and wanting to GTFO.)

          • Spanish Moss says:

            Speaking generally as to what I was brought back to… numbers. Specifically, the numbers of the triad I am playing in currently (7, 8, 9: been working some moon/yesod stuff recently) as related to the supernals (1, 2, 3) and the role of malkuth (10: Earth) in all of that. I have for the longest time been a big worker of numbers in my Craft but for some reason I have not touched it much in my current work. Very odd for me. To the Witch Math…

            Let’s see, some numbers and random meanings that ran through my head (albeit not the only ones):

            1=All
            2=Polarity
            3=Illumination
            7=Center of the Sphere
            8=Spokes of the wheel that reach from the circle center to circumference
            9=Center of the circle
            10=Physical and 01 (10 backwards…uhm, kether)

            Filtered through the lens of the Witch, or Magician or whatever form of magical initiate one may be, and the thoughts your post brought on (the lens being the maddening all interlinking thought process that magic brings on):

            1=9=10 :
            3=8 :
            2=7 :
            1~2~3=9~8~7

            Or

            All is the center of our existence as reflected from the dim of the mind and manifested into the physical : The chalice of understanding is the illumination of the form of the manifest :
            The relationship between I and Other opens awareness through the experiential as the force of what-is : I am that and the knowledge thereof as reflected through the gateway of the mind into form from what I can know via the vehicle of the flesh and earthly presence.

            I hope all that made sense. Most of it is qabbalisitc but I also play in Trad Witch lore and so what is hung on the tree is from that backyard in addition to my own delving.

            (Didn’t catch it that way. I was just agreeing with you. Glad to see I am not the only one playing in mental occultism at work at the moment.)

            -SM

  2. Pingback: Every Action is the Universe Calling Me « Ceremonial Magic Musings

  3. Xorplon says:

    Great blog. Another occult lover. Tell me what you think of some of my art,poems.
    Also check out my translation of the emerald tablet of thoth.

    Lemee know what you think :)

    –C.W.S

  4. Pingback: Mathetic Analysis of Agrippa, the Elements, and the Planets | The Digital Ambler

Leave a Note

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: